- Get link
- X
- Other Apps
Binary Diffusion Coefficient Calculator Guide Using Chapman–Enskog Theory for Gas-Phase Mass Transfer
The purpose of this article is to provide a rigorous, practical, and implementation-ready workflow for estimating binary gas diffusion coefficients using Chapman–Enskog kinetic theory, including required molecular parameters, collision integral evaluation, unit handling, and engineering checks.
1. Why binary diffusion coefficient estimation matters in gas-phase design
The binary diffusion coefficient, often written as DAB, quantifies how fast species A diffuses through species B under a concentration gradient in the gas phase.
Accurate DAB values are foundational for gas absorption and stripping, catalytic reactor effectiveness, boundary-layer mass transfer, evaporation and drying, leak dispersion screening, and any model using Sherwood–Reynolds–Schmidt correlations.
In many design workflows, DAB is needed at the operating temperature and pressure, not at standard conditions, so an explicit temperature and pressure model is required.
2. When Chapman–Enskog theory is an appropriate choice
Chapman–Enskog theory is a kinetic-theory-based model intended for dilute gases where molecular collisions dominate transport.
It is most appropriate when the mixture is in the gas phase, at relatively low density, and not extremely close to the critical region.
It is also commonly used for process engineering estimates because it provides a transparent dependence on temperature, pressure, and molecular size and energy parameters.
Note : Chapman–Enskog diffusion estimates can degrade at high pressures, near critical points, or in strongly associating systems, so treat results as screening values unless validated against reliable property data for the same T and P.
3. Chapman–Enskog equation for binary gas diffusion
3.1 Core equation in a widely used engineering unit set
A commonly implemented Chapman–Enskog form estimates the binary diffusion coefficient as follows.
DAB = (0.001858 · T3/2 · √(1/MA + 1/MB)) / (P · σAB2 · ΩD).
In this form, DAB is in cm2/s, T is in K, P is in atm, MA and MB are in g/mol, σAB is in Å, and ΩD is the diffusion collision integral as a function of reduced temperature.
3.2 What each term physically represents
T3/2 captures the increase in molecular speeds and collision frequency scaling from kinetic theory.
1/P captures the fact that higher pressure increases number density and collision rate, lowering diffusivity in dilute-gas behavior.
σAB2 represents an effective collision cross-sectional area, so larger molecules typically diffuse more slowly.
ΩD corrects the hard-sphere picture to a Lennard–Jones interaction model and is the main non-trivial temperature dependence beyond T3/2.
4. Required inputs and how to obtain them
4.1 Minimum required inputs for Chapman–Enskog DAB
You need operating temperature, operating pressure, molecular weights, and Lennard–Jones parameters for both species.
| Input | Symbol | Typical unit | How it is used |
|---|---|---|---|
| Temperature | T | K | Appears as T3/2 and in reduced temperature for ΩD. |
| Pressure | P | atm | Appears as 1/P scaling for dilute-gas diffusivity. |
| Molecular weight of A | MA | g/mol | Used in √(1/MA + 1/MB). |
| Molecular weight of B | MB | g/mol | Used in √(1/MA + 1/MB). |
| Lennard–Jones size parameter of A | σA | Å | Combined into σAB for collision cross section. |
| Lennard–Jones size parameter of B | σB | Å | Combined into σAB for collision cross section. |
| Lennard–Jones energy parameter of A | εA/k | K | Combined into εAB/k for reduced temperature T*. |
| Lennard–Jones energy parameter of B | εB/k | K | Combined into εAB/k for reduced temperature T*. |
4.2 Mixture combining rules typically used
For many engineering implementations, Lennard–Jones combining rules are applied as follows.
σAB = (σA + σB) / 2.
εAB = √(εA · εB), and equivalently (εAB/k) = √((εA/k) · (εB/k)).
The reduced temperature is T* = T / (εAB/k).
Note : For polar or strongly non-spherical molecules, some databases provide “effective” Lennard–Jones parameters already tuned for transport, and those are generally preferable to ad hoc corrections.
5. Diffusion collision integral ΩD and how to compute it
5.1 Role of ΩD
ΩD(T*) is a dimensionless correction from the Lennard–Jones potential that adjusts collision dynamics beyond a hard-sphere approximation.
As T* increases, the effective repulsion dominates and ΩD generally decreases, which tends to increase DAB for fixed T and P in addition to the explicit T3/2 factor.
5.2 A commonly implemented correlation form
One widely used fit for the Lennard–Jones diffusion collision integral uses the following functional form in terms of reduced temperature T*.
ΩD(T*) = (1.06036 / T*0.15610) + (0.19300 / exp(0.47635·T*)) + (1.03587 / exp(1.52996·T*)) + (1.76474 / exp(3.89411·T*)).
This correlation is popular because it is smooth, easy to implement, and behaves reasonably over typical engineering reduced-temperature ranges.
| Quantity | Expression | Implementation note |
|---|---|---|
| Reduced temperature | T* = T / (εAB/k). | Ensure T and ε/k are both in K. |
| Collision integral | ΩD(T*) from the correlation. | Use exp() with a floating type and avoid integer division. |
| Diffusivity scaling | DAB ∝ T3/2 / (P·σAB2·ΩD). | Do not mix SI and engineering units within one equation. |
Note : If your organization uses a different ΩD(T*) correlation, keep it consistent across projects because mixing correlations can create systematic shifts in DAB that look like process effects.
6. Unit handling and quick conversions
Many implementation errors come from silent unit mismatches, especially for pressure and diffusivity units.
| Quantity | Common unit | Conversion |
|---|---|---|
| Diffusivity | cm2/s to m2/s | 1 cm2/s = 1×10-4 m2/s. |
| Pressure | Pa to atm | P(atm) = P(Pa) / 101325. |
| Length | Å to m | 1 Å = 1×10-10 m. |
7. Step-by-step workflow for a robust Chapman–Enskog DAB estimate
7.1 The implementation checklist
Step 1 is to define the operating temperature T in K and operating pressure P in atm.
Step 2 is to collect MA and MB in g/mol.
Step 3 is to collect Lennard–Jones parameters σA, σB in Å, and εA/k, εB/k in K.
Step 4 is to compute σAB and εAB/k using combining rules.
Step 5 is to compute reduced temperature T* = T / (εAB/k).
Step 6 is to compute ΩD(T*) from a selected correlation.
Step 7 is to compute DAB in cm2/s using the Chapman–Enskog equation and then convert to m2/s if needed.
7.2 Engineering sanity checks that catch most mistakes
For many small molecules in gases near 1 atm and ambient temperature, DAB is often on the order of 10-5 to 10-4 m2/s.
If your result is orders of magnitude outside that range, a unit mismatch for σ, P, or D is the most likely issue.
At fixed composition and temperature, doubling pressure should roughly halve DAB under dilute-gas assumptions.
At fixed pressure, increasing temperature should increase DAB strongly, often close to a T3/2 trend moderated by ΩD.
Note : If you are calibrating a mass-transfer model to plant data, do not silently “tune” σ or ε/k to match, because that turns a transport property into a fitted parameter and reduces portability across conditions.
8. Worked example template with clearly defined inputs
This example is a calculation template intended to show the mechanics and unit flow, and it should be populated with verified Lennard–Jones parameters for your specific chemicals.
Given T, P, MA, MB, σA, σB, εA/k, and εB/k, compute σAB and εAB/k, then T*, then ΩD, then DAB.
If you need DAB in m2/s, multiply the cm2/s value by 1×10-4.
8.1 Implementation-ready Python example
The following code is intentionally explicit to reduce unit mistakes and to make each step auditable.
import math def omega_D(T_star: float) -> float: """ Diffusion collision integral Ω_D(T*) for Lennard–Jones 12-6 potential. T_star: reduced temperature T* = T / (epsilon_AB_over_k), dimensionless. Returns: Ω_D, dimensionless. """ term1 = 1.06036 / (T_star ** 0.15610) term2 = 0.19300 / math.exp(0.47635 * T_star) term3 = 1.03587 / math.exp(1.52996 * T_star) term4 = 1.76474 / math.exp(3.89411 * T_star) return term1 + term2 + term3 + term4 def D_AB_chapman_enskog_cm2_s( T_K: float, P_atm: float, M_A_g_mol: float, M_B_g_mol: float, sigma_A_Ang: float, sigma_B_Ang: float, epsilon_A_over_k_K: float, epsilon_B_over_k_K: float, ) -> float: """ Chapman–Enskog binary diffusion coefficient in cm^2/s. Inputs must follow the units in the parameter names. """ # 1) Combining rules. sigma_AB = 0.5 * (sigma_A_Ang + sigma_B_Ang) # Å. epsilon_AB_over_k = math.sqrt(epsilon_A_over_k_K * epsilon_B_over_k_K) # K. # 2) Reduced temperature. T_star = T_K / epsilon_AB_over_k # dimensionless. # 3) Collision integral. Omega = omega_D(T_star) # 4) Chapman–Enskog diffusivity. mass_term = math.sqrt((1.0 / M_A_g_mol) + (1.0 / M_B_g_mol)) D_cm2_s = 0.001858 * (T_K ** 1.5) * mass_term / (P_atm * (sigma_AB ** 2) * Omega) return D_cm2_s def cm2_s_to_m2_s(D_cm2_s: float) -> float: """ Convert cm^2/s to m^2/s. """ return D_cm2_s * 1e-4 # Example usage template. # Replace the placeholders with verified values for your species A and B. if __name__ == "__main__": T_K = 298.15 P_atm = 1.0 M_A = 0.0 # g/mol. M_B = 0.0 # g/mol. sigma_A = 0.0 # Å. sigma_B = 0.0 # Å. epsA_k = 0.0 # K. epsB_k = 0.0 # K. # Uncomment after filling placeholders. # D_cm2_s = D_AB_chapman_enskog_cm2_s(T_K, P_atm, M_A, M_B, sigma_A, sigma_B, epsA_k, epsB_k) # D_m2_s = cm2_s_to_m2_s(D_cm2_s) # print("D_AB =", D_cm2_s, "cm^2/s =", D_m2_s, "m^2/s")9. Practical extensions used in real projects
9.1 Temperature and pressure scaling for quick updates
If Lennard–Jones parameters are fixed and you only change operating conditions, you can recompute T* and ΩD at the new temperature and then apply the full Chapman–Enskog equation.
A quick screening approximation sometimes used is DAB(T,P) ≈ DAB(T0,P0) · (T/T0)3/2 · (P0/P), but this omits ΩD changes and should be treated as a rough estimate.
9.2 Multicomponent diffusion versus binary diffusion
Many mass-transfer correlations use a binary diffusion coefficient even in multicomponent mixtures by selecting a representative pair, such as solute-to-carrier diffusivity.
If true multicomponent diffusion is required, you typically build a matrix model and use binary Dij values as inputs to a multicomponent framework.
9.3 Using Chapman–Enskog alongside empirical alternatives
Engineering practice often compares Chapman–Enskog values against empirical correlations to gauge sensitivity, especially when molecular parameters are uncertain.
If the two approaches differ materially, the first investigation should be the quality and applicability of the molecular parameters and whether the gas is dilute under the operating conditions.
10. Common failure modes and how to prevent them
10.1 Wrong pressure unit
If Pa is inserted where atm is expected, DAB can be wrong by a factor of 101325.
Always convert pressure into the unit system required by the specific equation form you implement.
10.2 Wrong σ unit
If σ is in nm or m but treated as Å, σAB2 can be off by 102 to 1020 depending on the mismatch.
Because σ appears squared, this error is amplified.
10.3 Confusing ε and ε/k
Transport correlations often use ε/k in Kelvin rather than ε in Joules.
If ε/k is mistakenly treated as ε, reduced temperature T* becomes meaningless and ΩD becomes incorrect.
Note : Build your function signatures to include units in variable names, and keep one consistent unit convention throughout the full calculation path.
FAQ
What is the fastest way to estimate D_AB if I do not have Lennard–Jones parameters.
If Lennard–Jones parameters are unavailable, Chapman–Enskog cannot be completed as intended because σ_AB and Ω_D depend on those parameters.
In that situation, a practical workflow is to obtain transport-fitted Lennard–Jones parameters from a trusted property compilation used by your organization, or to use an alternative diffusion correlation that relies on more readily available descriptors.
Should I use Chapman–Enskog D_AB at high pressure for mass-transfer sizing.
At high pressure, gas non-ideality and dense-gas effects can reduce accuracy because the dilute-gas kinetic theory assumptions weaken.
If high-pressure operation is central to the design, treat Chapman–Enskog as a starting point and verify against property data or a dense-gas transport model aligned with your thermodynamic framework.
How sensitive is D_AB to Lennard–Jones parameter uncertainty.
D_AB scales with 1/σ_AB^2, so uncertainty in σ can have a strong effect.
ε/k influences Ω_D through T*, and the impact varies with temperature, so sensitivity testing at operating conditions is recommended when parameters are uncertain.
Why does my computed D_AB look too small by about 10,000 times.
A common cause is confusing cm^2/s and m^2/s.
If the equation form returns cm^2/s, you must multiply by 1×10^-4 to obtain m^2/s.
Can I use the same approach for liquid diffusion coefficients.
This Chapman–Enskog method is designed for gas-phase dilute mixtures and does not directly apply to liquids.
Liquid diffusion requires different models because molecular crowding, strong intermolecular forces, and viscosity-dominated transport change the physics.