Adiabatic Mixing Temperature Calculator: Temperature-Dependent Cp(T) Energy Balance Guide

on

CSTR Multiple Steady States Explained: Exothermic Reaction, Heat Removal, and S-Curve Stability Analysis

on

The purpose of this article is to provide a practical, engineer-ready method to analyze multiple steady states in an exothermic CSTR with heat removal by using heat-generation and heat-removal curves, constructing the classic S-curve, and applying stability criteria that directly support safe design and operation.

1. Why an exothermic CSTR can have multiple steady states.

A continuous stirred-tank reactor with an exothermic reaction can exhibit multiple steady states because the reaction rate typically increases strongly with temperature, while the heat removal capacity often increases more weakly or approximately linearly with temperature difference to a coolant or jacket.

At steady state, the reactor temperature must satisfy two balances at the same time, namely a material balance that fixes conversion as a function of temperature, and an energy balance that fixes temperature as a function of conversion and heat removal.

When these constraints are combined, the intersection between heat generation and heat removal can occur at one point, three points, or (at limiting conditions) two coincident points, which produces the well-known S-curve behavior in reactor temperature versus a parameter such as coolant temperature, heat transfer coefficient, or residence time.

2. Model setup for a single exothermic reaction in a CSTR.

2.1 Assumptions that match common design calculations.

The standard S-curve analysis is typically introduced using a single, irreversible exothermic reaction A → products, perfect mixing, constant density and heat capacity, and a single overall heat transfer term between reactor contents and a coolant stream or jacket.

These assumptions are not the only valid approach, but they are sufficient to reveal the mechanism of multiplicity and provide a reliable screening tool for ignition, extinction, and thermal runaway risk.

2.2 Steady-state material balance.

For species A in a CSTR at steady state, the mole balance can be written in the familiar form of inflow minus outflow minus consumption equals zero.

F_A0 - F_A - r_A V = 0.
Let C_A0 be inlet concentration, C_A be reactor concentration, v0 be volumetric flowrate, and τ = V / v0 be residence time.

Then F_A0 = v0 C_A0, and F_A = v0 C_A.

So C_A0 - C_A - r_A τ = 0.

Define conversion X = (C_A0 - C_A) / C_A0, so C_A = C_A0 (1 - X).

Then the CSTR design equation becomes:
X = (r_A τ) / C_A0, with r_A evaluated at reactor conditions.

For a common first-order kinetics model with Arrhenius temperature dependence, the rate is expressed as follows.

r_A = k(T) C_A. k(T) = k0 exp(-E / (R T)).
Then r_A = k0 exp(-E / (R T)) C_A0 (1 - X).

Substitute into X = (r_A τ) / C_A0:
X = τ k0 exp(-E / (R T)) (1 - X).

Solve for X(T):
X(T) = [τ k(T)] / [1 + τ k(T)].

This expression shows that conversion increases with temperature because k(T) increases with temperature, and this coupling is the root of strong thermal feedback in an exothermic CSTR.

2.3 Steady-state energy balance.

The steady-state energy balance equates heat generated by reaction to heat removed by sensible outflow and to heat transferred to the coolant.

Accumulation = 0 = Heat in - Heat out + Heat generated - Heat removed to coolant.
A common lumped form is:
0 = ρ Cp v0 (T0 - T) + (-ΔH) r_A V - U A (T - Tc).

Where:
ρ is density.
Cp is heat capacity.
T0 is inlet temperature.
T is reactor temperature.
(-ΔH) is heat of reaction, positive for exothermic reactions when written as -ΔH > 0.
U A is overall heat transfer coefficient times area.
Tc is coolant temperature.

Divide by ρ Cp v0 to express the balance in a form that highlights residence time.

0 = (T0 - T) + [(-ΔH) r_A V] / (ρ Cp v0) - [U A (T - Tc)] / (ρ Cp v0).
Using τ = V / v0:
0 = (T0 - T) + [(-ΔH) r_A τ] / (ρ Cp) - [U A (T - Tc)] / (ρ Cp v0).

Define a heat-removal parameter β = (U A) / (ρ Cp v0).

Then:
0 = (T0 - T) + [(-ΔH) r_A τ] / (ρ Cp) - β (T - Tc).

The nonlinearity enters primarily through r_A(T) via Arrhenius kinetics and through the dependence of r_A on concentration, which itself depends on conversion and therefore on temperature.

3. Heat-generation and heat-removal curves and the S-curve.

3.1 Constructing the heat-generation curve.

The heat-generation rate at steady state is the reaction heat release per time, expressed using the reactor rate and volume, or equivalently using residence time and flow.

Q_gen(T) = (-ΔH) r_A(T) V.
For first-order kinetics with C_A = C_A0 (1 - X(T)):
r_A(T) = k(T) C_A0 (1 - X(T)).
X(T) = [τ k(T)] / [1 + τ k(T)].
So (1 - X(T)) = 1 / [1 + τ k(T)].

Therefore:
r_A(T) = k(T) C_A0 / [1 + τ k(T)].

So:
Q_gen(T) = (-ΔH) V C_A0 k(T) / [1 + τ k(T)].

This function typically rises sharply with temperature over a range where Arrhenius dependence is dominant, and then can saturate at high temperature if conversion approaches a limit determined by the CSTR mixing and finite residence time.

3.2 Constructing the heat-removal curve.

Heat removal includes sensible heat carried out relative to the feed temperature and heat transferred to the coolant.

Q_rem(T) = ρ Cp v0 (T - T0) + U A (T - Tc).

For fixed flow and fixed coolant temperature, Q_rem(T) is approximately linear in T, which is why a curved Q_gen(T) can intersect it multiple times.

3.3 Intersection points and the origin of multiplicity.

Steady states occur where Q_gen(T) equals Q_rem(T).

If Q_rem(T) intersects Q_gen(T) three times, the reactor has three steady states at the same operating parameters, typically a low-temperature state, a middle-temperature state, and a high-temperature state.

When plotted as reactor temperature versus a parameter such as coolant temperature Tc, the set of steady states often forms an S-shaped curve, which is why this analysis is commonly called S-curve analysis.

Graphical object. What it represents. Typical shape. Design implication.
Q_gen(T). Exothermic heat release from reaction at steady state composition. Strongly nonlinear due to Arrhenius kinetics, often sigmoidal or sharply rising. Creates thermal feedback and can produce ignition and extinction.
Q_rem(T). Heat removed by sensible outflow plus heat transfer to coolant. Approximately linear in T for fixed U A, v0, Tc. Defines the cooling capacity and stabilizes temperature when sufficiently steep.
Intersections. Steady-state temperatures satisfying energy balance. One, three, or a tangent double intersection. Three intersections indicate possible multiplicity and hysteresis risk.

4. Stability of steady states and the slope criterion.

Multiplicity is a steady-state property, but safe operation requires identifying which steady states are stable against small perturbations.

A practical stability test for the temperature mode compares how fast heat generation increases with temperature versus how fast heat removal increases with temperature, evaluated at the steady state.

Define the net heat rate: Q_net(T) = Q_gen(T) - Q_rem(T). At steady state, Q_net(T*) = 0. A sufficient local stability condition for temperature is: dQ_net/dT evaluated at T* is negative. Equivalently: (dQ_gen/dT)|T* < (dQ_rem/dT)|T*. Since Q_rem(T) is typically linear: dQ_rem/dT = ρ Cp v0 + U A. Therefore, the steady state is stable if the slope of Q_gen(T) at the intersection is less than the constant slope of Q_rem(T).

In the common three-intersection case, the low-temperature and high-temperature steady states are typically stable, while the middle steady state is typically unstable, because the middle intersection occurs on a portion of Q_gen(T) where its slope is steep.

Note : In a real plant, “stable” does not mean “safe” because actuator limits, sensor delays, fouling, and disturbances can move the system across ignition or extinction points, after which the reactor can jump to another steady state with a large temperature change.

5. Ignition, extinction, and hysteresis in operating parameters.

5.1 Turning points on the S-curve.

The upper and lower turning points of the S-curve correspond to tangent conditions where Q_gen(T) and Q_rem(T) touch, so the intersection has multiplicity collapse from three to one.

These points are often called ignition and extinction points, depending on the direction of parameter change and the observed jump in temperature and conversion.

At a turning point (limit point), both conditions hold: Q_gen(T*) = Q_rem(T*). (dQ_gen/dT)|T* = (dQ_rem/dT)|T*.

Because the turning points occur at tangency, small changes in coolant temperature, heat transfer area, or feed temperature can eliminate one stable branch and force the reactor to transition abruptly to the other stable branch.

5.2 Hysteresis mechanism.

Hysteresis occurs when gradual parameter changes cause the reactor to follow one stable branch until it disappears at a turning point, at which time the reactor jumps to the remaining stable branch.

If the parameter is then reversed, the reactor typically does not return along the same path, because it remains on the new stable branch until the opposite turning point is reached.

Parameter change direction. Common observation. What happens at the turning point. Operational risk.
Cooling weakens, such as Tc increases or U A decreases. Temperature rises gradually on the low-temperature branch. Low branch disappears, reactor jumps to high-temperature branch. Sudden temperature and pressure increase, runaway potential.
Cooling strengthens, such as Tc decreases or U A increases. Temperature falls gradually on the high-temperature branch. High branch disappears, reactor jumps to low-temperature branch. Sudden conversion drop, off-spec product, possible quench or condensation issues.

6. Step-by-step procedure to perform an S-curve analysis in practice.

6.1 Decide the bifurcation parameter and what you will plot.

Choose one parameter to vary while holding others fixed, such as coolant temperature Tc, feed temperature T0, overall heat transfer U A, or residence time τ.

A common choice is to plot steady-state reactor temperature T versus coolant temperature Tc, because Tc is often an accessible manipulated variable and directly affects heat removal.

6.2 Build the algebraic steady-state equations.

Use the steady-state CSTR material balance and energy balance with a consistent kinetic model and property set.

For a single first-order exothermic reaction with Arrhenius kinetics, the following pair is a standard starting point.

Material relation: X(T) = [τ k0 exp(-E/(R T))] / [1 + τ k0 exp(-E/(R T))].
Energy balance in Q-form:
(-ΔH) V C_A0 k(T) / [1 + τ k(T)] = ρ Cp v0 (T - T0) + U A (T - Tc).

6.3 Solve for steady states and identify multiplicity.

For each value of the chosen parameter, solve the energy balance equation for T.

If multiple solutions exist, keep all physically meaningful solutions, typically those with T > 0 and 0 ≤ X ≤ 1.

Then compute X for each T solution using the material relation.

6.4 Classify stability using the slope test.

Compute dQ_gen/dT and compare it to dQ_rem/dT at each steady state.

If dQ_gen/dT is smaller, the steady state is locally stable in the temperature mode, and if dQ_gen/dT is larger, the steady state is locally unstable.

6.5 Locate ignition and extinction points.

Find parameter values where the tangency conditions are met.

Numerically, this often means solving the pair Q_net(T) = 0 and dQ_net/dT = 0 simultaneously for T and the parameter.

Note : In commissioning or troubleshooting, never attempt to “probe” multiplicity boundaries by moving coolant temperature without a formal hazard review, because crossing an ignition point can produce a rapid temperature rise that exceeds relief and containment assumptions.

7. Engineering interpretation and design levers.

7.1 How heat transfer capacity shifts the S-curve.

Increasing U A increases the slope of Q_rem(T) and generally reduces the likelihood of three intersections, thereby reducing multiplicity risk.

Decreasing U A due to fouling or loss of coolant flow can reintroduce multiplicity in a system that was previously single-valued, which is a common mechanism behind unexpected temperature excursions.

7.2 How residence time shifts heat generation.

Increasing τ increases conversion at a given temperature and can increase heat generation at moderate temperatures, potentially expanding the multiplicity region.

Decreasing τ by increasing throughput can reduce conversion and heat generation, but it can also reduce the sensible heat removal term ρ Cp v0 (T - T0) per unit volume depending on how the balance is formulated, so the net effect must be checked with the full equations.

7.3 How feed conditions influence ignition risk.

Higher inlet temperature T0 reduces the sensible cooling duty required to reach elevated reactor temperatures, which can move operating points closer to ignition conditions.

Higher reactant concentration C_A0 increases the potential heat release and can steepen Q_gen(T), which increases multiplicity and thermal sensitivity.

Design lever. Primary equation term affected. Typical effect on multiplicity. Practical note.
Increase U A or heat transfer area. U A (T - Tc) and dQ_rem/dT. Reduces or removes multiple steady states. Check fouling allowance and verify coolant-side limits.
Lower coolant temperature Tc. Shifts Q_rem(T) upward at fixed T. Moves operation toward low-temperature branch. Consider condensation, viscosity, and crystallization constraints.
Reduce reactant concentration. Scales Q_gen(T) through C_A0. Reduces heat generation and multiplicity risk. May require larger reactor volume to meet production.
Reduce residence time τ. Affects X(T) and r_A(T). Often reduces conversion and heat generation at a given T. Confirm effects with full mass and energy balances.

8. Minimal numerical workflow template for solving the S-curve.

The following pseudocode-style workflow outlines a robust way to compute multiple steady states by scanning Tc and solving for T roots of Q_net(T) for each Tc.

1. Define constants: ρ, Cp, V, v0, τ = V/v0, U, A, ΔH, k0, E, R, C_A0, T0. 2. Choose a range of Tc values to scan. 3. For each Tc: a. Define k(T) = k0 * exp(-E/(R*T)). b. Define rA(T) = k(T) * C_A0 / (1 + τ*k(T)). c. Define Qgen(T) = (-ΔH) * V * rA(T). d. Define Qrem(T) = ρ*Cp*v0*(T - T0) + U*A*(T - Tc). e. Define Qnet(T) = Qgen(T) - Qrem(T). f. Find all roots T* of Qnet(T) = 0 over a safe temperature bracket. g. For each root T*: i. Compute X(T*) = (τ*k(T*))/(1 + τ*k(T*)). ii. Compute stability using slope test: stable if dQgen/dT at T* < (ρ*Cp*v0 + U*A). 4. Collect (Tc, T*, X, stability) and plot T versus Tc to visualize the S-curve.

This workflow supports both design studies and troubleshooting studies, provided that the temperature bracket is chosen based on chemistry constraints, material limits, and credible upset conditions.

FAQ

What does it mean physically when a CSTR has three steady states at the same operating conditions.

It means the same feed conditions, flowrate, and cooling configuration can support three different steady reactor temperatures that each satisfy the steady-state mass and energy balances.

Typically the lowest and highest temperature solutions are locally stable, while the middle solution is locally unstable, so the reactor will not remain at the middle state when disturbed.

How can I identify the unstable steady state without running a full dynamic simulation.

You can apply the slope criterion based on heat-generation and heat-removal curves at the steady-state intersection.

If the temperature sensitivity of heat generation exceeds that of heat removal at the intersection, the steady state is locally unstable in the temperature mode.

What are ignition and extinction points in S-curve analysis.

They are turning points where two steady states merge and disappear, mathematically corresponding to a tangency between Q_gen(T) and Q_rem(T) where both Q_net(T) = 0 and dQ_net/dT = 0 hold.

Crossing these points by changing cooling or feed conditions can cause an abrupt jump to another steady state, which is the origin of hysteresis behavior.

Which parameters most commonly create multiple steady states in an exothermic CSTR.

Strong Arrhenius kinetics, large heat of reaction, high reactant concentration, insufficient heat transfer capacity, and coolant temperatures that reduce the driving force for heat removal commonly promote multiplicity.

The most effective mitigations typically involve increasing heat removal capability, reducing the potential heat release, or tightening operating constraints to avoid ignition boundaries.

How should multiplicity considerations be reflected in safe operating limits.

Safe operating limits should avoid regions near turning points because small disturbances or degradation in cooling can trigger transitions to a high-temperature branch.

Limits are commonly implemented as constraints on coolant temperature, minimum coolant flow, maximum feed temperature, maximum reactant concentration, and maximum allowable fouling, supported by relief design and verified control performance.

추천·관련글